Post by
Tcheck on Sep 29, 2020 3:17pm
boardmembers affiliated to one shareholder
is a nono
a monitor PWC .related to that same shareholder
is also a nono
an independent process is in order
Comment by
dalesio_98 on Sep 29, 2020 3:36pm
You make many allegations, can you prove them? You doubt CCAA SISP, Nemaska, Nemaska board & special committee, PwC, McCarthy Tetrault, Stikeman Elliot, Stein Monast, KPMG and financial advisors BNC & Clarkson P. ? Put together your proof, I'll provide you with a list of specialized class action firms for you to contact. :-) ;) Talk is cheap, a pseudonym behind a monitor and keyboard.
Comment by
mick1888 on Sep 29, 2020 4:11pm
dalesio, any ideawhat happened to the Softbank shares (will they lose them), and will they be compensated in other ways (stream sale compensation)?
Comment by
dalesio_98 on Sep 29, 2020 5:51pm
Nothing has been heard from SB, they certainly have their own issues. -- Perhaps there is something on SB hidden within the IQ/PG legal maneuver, 600 some odd page document sealed in court record. -- If that is not the case, SB should be in the same boat as other shareholders.
Comment by
mick1888 on Sep 29, 2020 7:14pm
Thanks dalesio. If it is the case that SB receives preferrential treatment as an 'ordinary' shareholder, surely all other shareholders of the same standing could appeal? KTF.... ;-)
Comment by
bigkagan on Sep 29, 2020 8:41pm
yes, they better don't mess with Softbank, it's an C$80 billion behemoth and has very good lawyers
Comment by
bigkagan on Sep 29, 2020 8:47pm
maybe the FB group should contact Softbank and sic them on IQ and the gang
Comment by
TicTacTo on Sep 30, 2020 6:41am
SB will not received preferential treatment, their shares are worthless and there is no money (or very little) to pay for contract cancelation. SB just take their loss and forget it, one failed investment among hundreds of investment ...