Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

Nemaska Lithium Inc is a Canada based lithium company. It is engaged in exploring and evaluating lithium properties and processing of spodumene into lithium compounds in Quebec, Canada. The company supplies lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate to the lithium battery industry used in electric vehicles, cell phones, tablets, and other consumer products.

GREY:NMKEF - Post Discussion

Nemaska Lithium Inc > Special Shareholders Meeting
View:
Post by dalesio_98 on Oct 04, 2020 4:47am

Special Shareholders Meeting

RAN is progressing on the Special Shareholders Meeting (SSM) front. Judge Gouin is aware of our written request to convene a SSM.
Comment by Tcheck on Oct 04, 2020 11:52am
In fact this board and the monitor PWC are discredited and a vote should be held to check whether they still have the full support and trust of the shareholders to carry out their duty of caretakers of the company in the interest of all the shareholders ,at such an important juncture in the history of the company . the acts of this board are questionable . the composition of the board is and ...more  
Comment by mick1888 on Oct 04, 2020 12:27pm
Thanks dalesio, do we need the judges permission to proceed with a SSM. And if that is the case, what would the implications be if he did support the application. That would give the impression he was not entirely comfortable with the current status of proceedings? KTF.... ;-)
Comment by dalesio_98 on Oct 05, 2020 3:07am
UPDATE For your information, I corresponded with McCarthy Tetrault (MCT) over the weekend, MCT will suspend our special shareholder meeting request on Tuesday. We await the motion, Me Lozeau will defend our right to hold the special meeting. I provided MCT the file sharing link to access the 1650 proxies totaling 87 million shares in my response. I believe MCT will provide the ...more  
Comment by dalesio_98 on Oct 05, 2020 3:09am
McCarthy Ttrault (MCT) did not reject our written request to hold a Special Shareholders Meeting (SSM) due to being under the CCAA. MCT did not reject our written request to hold a special shareholder meeting. MCT alluded to our request not being conform, I provided additional details on Saturday along with the link to access shareholder proxies. Why is Nemaska legal counsel ...more  
Comment by Calgary_AB on Oct 05, 2020 3:33am
I wish you good luck and it looks like you are on top of it. This whole process could/should have been started when the FB Group was first formed...
Comment by mick1888 on Oct 05, 2020 3:47am
And so say all of us CalAB... ;-) I think that's the nicest thing you've said on NMX (ok with caveats)... ;-)
Comment by surveyor2582 on Oct 05, 2020 12:32pm
Hi Calgary, I'm amazed your still following this nightmare, You were right all along and I for one will admit that I should have listened to you, Now I have 1,000 useless shares that I paid far more than what they are worth, Oh well, lesson learned,
Comment by Calgary_AB on Oct 05, 2020 10:50pm
Hi Surveyor, yes still here, I promissed I will post the last post before they take it off the stockhouse :) 1,000 is not that big of a loss, it's recoverable, good thing you didn't have 300,000 like some people here...when I sold, I had over 350,000....
Comment by bigkagan on Oct 05, 2020 12:50pm
even if the judge rejects the SSM there is always an appeal, don't forget
Comment by dalesio_98 on Oct 05, 2020 2:24pm
Will you be contributing to legal funding should an appeal be necessary? Moreover, did you assist with initial legal funding?
Comment by bigkagan on Oct 05, 2020 4:01pm
sure, I will throw in a few bucks if others will also do it, you will have to give the account number on this MB
Comment by bigkagan on Oct 06, 2020 2:09am
found this Russian song which is done by musicians who live in the cities with nuclear power stations, it's real good 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities