NanoXplore Inc NNXPF

Electrovaya v.2

[templetooth2]

I am more than ready to jump aboard this rocket. But in the immortal words of Ronald Reagan, "Trust, but verify!"

I've developed a deep suspicion of this story over the last 2 years, possibly more. When I hear that the wet-process graphene is non-competitive to carbon black I get real suspicious. That we are competing with carbon black is beyond comprehension and every piece of corporate propaganda I've read. So now we get dry graphene? What? If graphene is the solution to all mens ills, real or imagined, should it make any difference whether it's derived wet or dry?

I await details, thanks. Lots of details with corporate signatures attached, not Ministry of This-Could-Happen propaganda.

[1student]

templetooth2, You are correct in suggesting that one always verify before trusting. I did question why a news release on behalf of NanoXplore was not publicly disseminated confirming allleged confirmation of such facts which had been suggested here by somebody else. I also obviously agree with you that waiting for "lots of details with corporate signatures attached, not Ministry of This