Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Newstrike Brands Ltd NWKRF

"Newstrike Brands Ltd is a licensed producer and cultivator of medical cannabis based in Brantford, Ontario. The company cultivates and sells both forms including dried and fresh marihuana."

OTCPK:NWKRF - Post Discussion

View:
Post by silkroad007 on May 17, 2018 8:17pm

Warrants

guys there seems to be so much back and forth here. 

Split - If there is a split or whatever the warranst will adjust accordingly.  Zero sum game and someone also made a comment about the fact the SP will never reach the strike price this way.  It's a zero sum game and the value of the company will be SP X shares period.   If the rollback is 10:1 and the SP is now at $10 and teh Warrant Strike at 17.50 its no difference than 1.00 and 1.75.  Percentage is the same and its all a derivitive of total company market cap.  

Buyout - Im not a laywer but someone mentioed if there is a buyout the new company can choose to keep the warrants or not?  Sure maybe true but it would have to include a compensation or conversion.  Stop trying to be laywers and interpret wording 7 different ways.  Take a logical step back and say - does this even makes sense? You cant just vapourize 70M dollars in this case.  If that was the case you would have companies getting buyouts everyday just to vapourize warrants and then flip it back to the original company for $1.  Warrants would cease to even be a thing.  Not to mention CRA would be all over your A$$ from a tax perspective.
Comment by JJECYYZ on May 17, 2018 8:36pm
Well said. Thank you. Logical. I've been trying to explain.... this sums it up. Go HIP GO!!!
Comment by 321Blastoff on May 17, 2018 8:52pm
If this is a "zero sum game" when it comes down to warrants and share price after consolidation and how the stock price will be represented in the current market then that is just great. The problem is that it won't necessarily work that way in the real world because you are only talking about the simple parallel mathematics of your "zero sum game" and disregarding the ...more  
Comment by JJECYYZ on May 17, 2018 8:56pm
I think what he means and I mean. Is that right after the fact.....it is a zero sum game. Nothing gained or lost. but yes, what you say may happen.
Comment by 321Blastoff on May 17, 2018 9:28pm
Well this is what I have been extremely apprehensive about. A "zero sum game" immediately after the fact but then what happens ?  
Comment by JJECYYZ on May 17, 2018 9:41pm
YUP.... but we are kind of there now. We don't know what will happen.
Comment by 321Blastoff on May 17, 2018 9:51pm
Well then if we don't know what will happen I think it would be prudent to wait a bit and try to build up the business before making a decision to engage in something as risky as share consolidation.
Comment by JJECYYZ on May 17, 2018 10:01pm
Hey, I voted No. That's all i can do at this point we have to wait and see what the board does. BTW sent you a PM.
Comment by NNR1000 on May 18, 2018 1:13am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities