Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Oromin Explorations Ltd OLEPF

GREY:OLEPF - Post Discussion

Oromin Explorations Ltd > At this point redundant but factual information...
View:
Post by tony1969 on Feb 11, 2013 10:37pm

At this point redundant but factual information...

from Teranga's web site on their future growth strategy.

"Growth

The Company has outlined a two-stage growth plan:

Phase 1: Become a mid-tier gold producer in Senegal with 250,000 to 350,000 ounces of annual gold production leveraging off the Company’s existing mill and infrastructure.

Phase 2: Increase annual gold production to 400,000 to 500,000 ounces via a mill expansion as reserves increase.

The Company’s objective is to increase reserves and production which in turn should increase earnings and cash flow per share, through both internal exploration discoveries and strategic acquisitions. "

 

They just said at the RBC conference that if they were to make an acquisition they would only consider OLE.

 

With all due respect to the guys at TGZ.  I do not think they can get to that 400,000 to 500,000 ounce target by themselves.  It seems like they are having some issues with their costs.  

 "Total mine site cash production costs for 2013 are expected to rise by between $30 and $35 million compared to 2012 due to an increase in mining (up 24 percent) and processing (up 37 percent) rates."

It sounds like they have to work more and spend more than they did in 2012 to pull less gold.   What does this mean? They are going to pull lower grade gold in 2013.

 They are now projecting between 190,000 to 210,000 ounces for 2013. They produces 214,310 ounces in 2012.  I cannot see them internally ramping up production (essentially doubling their current projections) in order to hit their goals without a strategic acquisition.

I should be given some OLE stock options for all this research.

Comment by couples4 on Feb 11, 2013 11:48pm
Thanks Tony,maybe your best post since I know your name....Appropriate,accurate,with full research...it really helps me to stay and wait for...
Comment by tony1969 on Feb 12, 2013 7:00am
Thanks for your kind words couples.  The fact that TGZ will be producing less gold and spending more money raises a red flag. It is only a matter of time before we become one with them. Unless someone beats them to it.  I do not write posts for ratings but it is nice to see that some of you guys gave me 4's last night for my last two posts.  I guess this means you guys got ...more  
Comment by Treetop2 on Feb 12, 2013 12:28pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities