RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:USA Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) 2022 Re: Biotech and Chinayour problem is that you cite federal laws in brown v boe and roe v wade. you would be correct that in those cases states would have to follow supreme court decisions regarding federal law.
the problem with your approach is that you cited the michigan case alleging it would bind other states or that it could be appealed to the supreme court. just flatly not so. state supreme courts are the final arbiters of state law. only if a state supreme court were to misinterpret a federal law when making a state decision would it be appealable to the supreme court.
there is the concept of vertical stare decisis which obligates lower courts to adhere strictly to rulings made by higher courts WITHIN THE SAME JURISDICTION. that means a FEDERAL court of appeals must abide by decisions made by scotus. federal courts, including scotus, make decision about federal law. state courts have to abide by decisions made by their state supreme court.
so again, a state supreme court making a ruling on a state law has the final say. it's not appealable to scotus.
i would strongly advise you to see if there are any holiday inn express vacancies in your area and check into one tonight so that you can research this matter.