Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Oncolytics Biotech Inc ONCY


Primary Symbol: T.ONC

Oncolytics Biotech Inc. is a biotechnology company. The Company is focused on developing pelareorep, an intravenously delivered immunotherapeutic agent that activates the innate and adaptive immune systems and weakens tumor defense mechanisms. This compound induces anti-cancer immune responses and promotes an inflamed tumor phenotype turning cold tumors hot through innate and adaptive immune... see more

TSX:ONC - Post Discussion

Oncolytics Biotech Inc > Clarity time again…clear out the mud..or should I say FUD
View:
Post by canadafan on Apr 18, 2024 4:41pm

Clarity time again…clear out the mud..or should I say FUD

It seems this form goes in waves of clarity, then outright none- sense FUD.
Final word in the shaeholder voting.
Obviously a long waste if time & perhaps the FUdsters don't even own shares?
if they did ...a quick read shows the wording is clearly " for or against"
Mine came today in the mail.
So a lot if dialog around nothing. As I said a red herring.
i will be voting " for". As others have said, changing top level at this stage would be counter productive.
repeating where we are, unde4 existing mangement?
1. Very recent proposal to meet with FDA to further refine the phase 3 MBc trial details. A very positive direction.
2. Overall survival results MBc trial/ with Pfizer. Results expected soon.Since we don't have published data, we can only go by knowing the delay is due to patients still alive.
3. Upcoming announcement of the start of additional trial , Gobblet addition. Resulting From the $5 million grant from PanCan.Again, great progress.
A new manager team would have zero influence on any of the in place studies or reults.
The results are what will get onc Pelareorep to market.
Nothing else matters....not wages, not stock options, nit the trading SP.
If Pelareorep proves out either the MBc or pancreatic cancer, the company will become.worth multinbillions.
RBC has a forward prediction of $5 billion/ year in sales, based in only one of the potential markets.
Nothing said on this site or any will change the medical outcomes.
Other side note. It was mentioned that when I post the price goes down.
liking my posts to any price mivmebt in any direction is absolutely silly!
I post almost every day.
There is no relationship to my posts & the moving price.
One can also say when I post the price goes  up..lol
As it does go up & down every day & I post almost every day.
As far as me wishing everyone a good day.
Well sincere wishes, nothing more nothing less.
i am surrounded by relatives & friends with various cancer issues.
One very close a young lady, Family, recently had a double mastectomy. Her mom also a relative of mine, had similar 10 years ago.
She underwent chemo at the time. That sideffects almost killed her.
After ten years, the standard of care , very little change.
Another long time friend of  mine ( he alo is an Onc shareholder) is dealing with his family member.
MM cancer. Chemo has been increased from once every 2 months to 2x/ week.
His most recent scan, two areas stable, two advancing & one new.
Meaning the chemo is probably doing nothing.
Myself , I have been dealing with disabling post surgery scar tissue & pains. Lucky for me, not cancer related.
Two weeks ago a walking friend of mine sucumed to advanced cancer.
I have posted in the past. Every single relative on my mothers side, starting with my grandparents died of only cancer.
so, when I wish everyone a safe & healthy day...that is exactly what I mean.
oncolytics biotech is a cancer therapy company. I know cancer. I know the treatment regimes.
The Pelareorep option is a new approach. 

An actual cancer vaccination!
Pela does light up tumours. Allowing the immune system to help. Also as a co- therapy increases the useful abilities of existing therapies.
Yes they are taking a very long time to get a deal.
Then again the O.S.  Of Bracelet continues to move forward.
longer is better.
have a safe & healthy day.

regads

Comment by inthno on Apr 18, 2024 6:21pm
Red Herring or not as you say but I find that onc has been slipping up lately. As you say for or against or for or withheld makes no difference but it is the wording that is confusing people and this is what ONC posted on sedar which clearly states for or withheld. I found that made a similar mistake when they reported that insiders beneficially owned almost 6% of the company when in fact they ...more  
Comment by inthno on Apr 18, 2024 6:23pm
fyi it will not let me post the pic of the proxy on sedar so you have to go there yourself and see it.
Comment by canadafan on Apr 18, 2024 7:07pm
I don't care what SEDAR says. The shareholders voting proxy, which I received in the mail today, clearly says " for or against" you would know that if you had shares. My voting proxy is directly linked to my number of shares. looking @ SEDAR , is 100% irrelevant. I must have shares to vote. That in turn generates my proxy pages. you seem obsessed with finding mistakes, that may or ...more  
Comment by inthno on Apr 18, 2024 7:20pm
Wow I did not know that looking at sedar was 100% irrelevant and they posted the same mistake on their website under their filings....It would be nice if they were consistent so as to not cause confusion with shareholders... That would be similar to someone saying that Matt exercised 350,000 options which was simply a mistake but of course some might say that it is completely irrelevant even ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse