Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Liminal BioSciences Inc. PFSCF


Primary Symbol: LMNL

Liminal BioSciences is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery and development of novel, small molecule drug candidates for the treatment of patients suffering from fibrotic or inflammatory diseases that have a high unmet medical need. Liminal BioSciences operates on an integrated basis from our talent hubs in Laval, Quebec, Canada, and Cambridge, UK. Our common shares are listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market.


NDAQ:LMNL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by francois21on May 25, 2012 3:11pm
225 Views
Post# 19947627

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Albiglutide

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Albiglutide

Stockman,

 

What I think is that they would pay a licence, or an exclusity right on a use of one specific ligand for a diabet drug, like we think that Celgene bought the rightson a specific application, i.e., a cancer drug. 

 

There's a patent on PLI technology, and they wouldn't be able to produce it and use it without being sued. 

 

If I push a little this reflexion, and I'm not a lawyer, I think that (If I was the client) I would have a clause in the licence agreement or supply agreement to be entitle to have the full receipe and use it  if for some reason PLI couldn't deliver the orders. They are not making toasters, and just can't change the way to manufacture a drug without going back to regulatory approval, so I can imagine it would be only in this circonstance that a client should be allowed to manufacture himself any ligands.  

Bullboard Posts