RE:RE:RE:RE:Cheerleader dilution Gunner is an idiot with no skin in the game.
I own shares. The idiot is the guy who bought back in at $23. LMFAO
Also, I may knock the company....but you can't disput what I have said. LOL bought back in at $23
aldo451 wrote: I agree Gobbs and I don't like it either, it is difficult to make any sense of this. There are so many things that don't add up.
As retailers I can believe that we may have been suckered in. However, institutional like Consonance who invested 50M? and TV that converted their debt to shares, is to me an indication that there’s gotta be something of value.
I am long, over 13 years, bought and sold over this period but still under. I did get out at 0.22$, bought back with an average of $23 converted, I have waited this long and a few more months won’t kill me.
What bothers me is aholes like PLITheOne that have no skin in the game but make doomsday statements that are not founded on any facts. Yes history, but even though some of the actors are the same, the director has changed, and I want to believe that TV is here to make this work and make money.
The other irritant to me, is how a shareholder would continuously knock the company they are invested in, they would have to be total idiot (Gunner).
I am invested, I am long, but I am definitely not a pumper as the same Ahole mentioned above has called me.
A few more months and we will have a clearer picture, I hope for my sake and the many others that the wait was worth it.