Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals
"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."


GREY:PGDIF - Post by User

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. > PGD in-situ values then and now
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(2)
•••
Comment by robybobon Jan 26, 2015 6:12pm
58 Views
Post# 23365314

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PGD in-situ values then and now

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PGD in-situ values then and nowthanks ekim, so your adding off the chart both CH6 and CH6 (i)?

first one is inferred mineral resource and talks about carats etc., the second is kimberlite tonnage, if they added another 3.2-4.38 tonnage to CH6, that would be more than 15% No?

What I added was the new mineral resource estimate of CH6, now updated to 8.57 million carats, then took the tonnage of 7 and 44 multiplied by 1.04 to get carats.  Just over 18 million, on the high end of the numbers

 dazed and confused
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities