Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

thanks ibeenorth

[cudjo]

And please explain how falling 20% short of the financing is a good thing.  I have never said this cant be a mine, I am saying they are short the funds they wanted, 7 is short on the diamonds they needed, and believe the valuations will be short on the $$.  You only have a Too the moon Alice point of view.  Everything you see tells you, paper weight and shortfall.  First all the pompoms pinned their hopes on 7, whoops, next you ALL said management would pick up any left overs, whoops, now you will all say the valuations and glue will save you, stop thinking with your hearts and use your heads, this TRAIN requires millions more to get it moving.

[ibeennorth]

thanks I do respect some of your points of view.....but the repetition of your doom comments are worthless by repetition. 20 % less is not good but I don't think you thought they would do this good correct me if im wrong?? second this has been a real shitty time for the stock knock on wood why did it not go below 10 CENTS. as for retail im sure retail is not investing in much PERIOD. but what

[cudjo]

Thanks ibeennorth, what about all the pumping posts?  Pumpers never have an issue with this do they?  I am not down on the company and I will give you my opinion when I think this is a buy. If ever now. I have been long and short here. I have made money and lost, lost only as being a long BTW. As has all the longs here, including ekim.  My point is simple, there will be no training

[ekim]

So, If i stay silent and not respond to your post about the paid pumper reference..it must mean I get paid. If I respond...it sounds like I'm overly defensive...therefore I must be a paid pumper. If the company doesn't fill it's quota...it means they failed. If the company issues any shares..it means it's dilution...and another fail. So, they company failed to increase the

[cudjo]

Ekim, you win, I can not counter your counterpoints on being company man or paid, your not paid, I will not bring it up again.  I also agree that winner has not been decided and won't be for a very long time.  I do think there may be a point to cover and get in again, just not yet.

[greex27]

Hat's off for taking the high road. I get bits and pieces from each post that make you question your resolve or help confirm it and I find more value in the nay sayers than I do the believers. I'm a believer but I need to keep in check and the nay sayers help me do that. 

[mill44]

Greex, I never understood the need for someone to hear that they were right about their decision to get in or out of a stock. Once you made your decision, the reason you did it should be the only thing that matters, unless you did it because someone said that you should. People should be interested more in the other side, to see if they missed something when doing DD (assuming that most do that

[ekim]

All about risk/reward Cudjo. I run the risk of staying invested over that long haul and eventually..maybe getting a small/big reward or nothing at all. You run the risk of missing being in the stock (or being fully invested) on that one day that some big announcement is made versus picking up small profits along the way. Assume the long haul and in the same tone...I think almost everyone was

[mill44]

It is not completely true about PGM, Ekim.

[mill44]

That's the problem, Ekim, when people talk about the poster more than his posts. Even if you were a paid poster, the only thing that should matter is what you are saying. Oiltar's pinks and fancies are an interesting subject, how can you prove that something won't happen in the future with 100% certainty? Your numbers are a different thing, they are verifiable. Facts are facts no

[Kodiboy]

Personally, I believe it does matter who you think a poster is, even if you cannot prove it one way or another...if it did not matter, it would not be a topic of discussion. Just like discussing what we think the Freidlands motives are, just because we are uncertain whet they are, should not dictate whether we can or should not discuss what we "think".  I think it's ok to

[mill44]

Yes, they are spec stocks, not spec posters. Neither Ekim's or my motives will influence the stock, but there is a slight chance that Friedland's might.