Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."

GREY:PGDIF - Post Discussion

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. > Hang on there Longs, lots of upside here and many variables
View:
Post by justanormalguy on Aug 11, 2016 9:40pm

Hang on there Longs, lots of upside here and many variables

I thought I'd provide a summary related to the basement, low ball NPV that PGD provided in the Phase 1 PEA to the Longs, Analysts, Newbies, and Management, and outline where we can see incremental increases in both NPV and IRR. I'm still a bit taken back as to why such conservatism....I really hope that is simply the nature of the team's personality to build the model as robust as possible for their own credibility, and not for any, any (yes, I said that twice) other reasons.

Are you telling me you could not reasonably justify another 0.2% to the IRR to bring it into the 30's. Hmmmm.......Aside from getting an explanation on what the plans/options are (as broad as they may be), the reason for this conservatism on NPV is the question I most want an answer to.

On a scale 1 to 10, 1 being very conservative and 10 being very aggressive, I rate PGD's PEA 1.5 out of 10.

Potential Upsides NPV/IRR in the Short to Medium Term PEA/PFS (my interpretation from numerous PGD public reports and press releases, Mike's Blog ( https://chidliak.blogspot.ca/), JK's comments, Will's comments, and ideas from this SH Blog). IMO

  1. PEA slope angles used from 35 to 48 degrees. Expected that once geotechnical work is done, slope angle will increase. Right now, this results in a higher strip ratio and 13% and 35% left out of the PEA for CH6 and 7 respectively. Only 11.8 million carats for 6/7 are included in the PEA, versus 15.6 million carats currently inferred.

  2. Diamonds below depth of 260 m for CH6 and 240 m for CH7 not in PEA. 2.2 mT to 3.5 mT TFFE in CH6 and 0.9 mT to 2.4 mT TFFE in CH7. To be better defined in 2017 Winter Program.

  3. FX rate used in PEA 78 cents. Higher than recent other PEAs

  4. Discount rate of 7.5% used. 4 out of 5 comparative PEAs used 5, 5, 7 and 7%

  5. PEA assumes full cost to PGD for All Winter Road. Potential exists for sharing costs through Federal Infrastructure Program and/or Third Party (potential power line)

  6. Operating costs could be reduced by switching to LNG or Battery-Powered (remember, mining starts 4 years from now, technology moves very fast), from Diesel

  7. Diamond breakage in CH7 “all four geological units in the 2015 CH-7 bulk sample reveals that 75% to 90% of the diamonds were damaged, well over double what is typically found for large-diameter RC drill programs “ “ that the breakage observed has resulted in a 10% to 40% loss of carat weight due to minus 1.13 mm diamond fragments reporting to the sump during screening of the bulk sample at Chidliak “ This will increase both the diamond value and diamond grade, thus the ore value per tonne at CH7.

  8. The diamond valuator made some very clear comments in previous press releases. In the PEA, the diamond value used was considerablely less than the higher model average price valued by WWW.

  9. The winter program will further define CH6 and CH7, and will likely result in a change in sequencing with the highest ore value per tonne at surface likely mine early on. My personal thoughts are that Domain 5 and Domain 2 will show improved cpt and higher carat values.

  10. Diamond-bearing nodules have not been fully explained, understood, resolved, nor accounted for (I recall 3 of them being pulled from the analysis so as not to distort the numbers)

  11. With more funds in the medium term, further exploration at CH1, 44, 45, 46, 31 and Area B will no doubt be added to the mine plan.

  12. PEA uses 2000 tonnes/day for LOM of 10 years. As exploration continues, I can easily see a 3000 tonnes/day operation. Impact will be slight increase to capital cost, material increase to annual revenue, and material decrease to operating cost/tonne. Net impact = material change in profit margin.

Let's not forget about the other assests PGD has (see pdiam.com), which seem to be valued at zero in terms of the stock price.

Is this a $500 million NPV company? I think not. In terms of a PEA, in the medium term with some financing, NPV should range between $1 and $1.5 billion, IRR over 45%, just for CH6 and CH7. Then add everything else. Then pretend we're actually in a mining scenario where specials and coloured diamonds could come in to play. And perhaps there are some valuable metals also in place in-situ. Endless. Good luck. IMO

Normal Guy

Comment by Kodiboy on Aug 11, 2016 10:53pm
Nice work normalguy...thank you for that good read! I'll give you a 9.5... 
Comment by justanormalguy on Nov 20, 2016 3:04pm
Me, dreaming big.... my hope for PGD offerThe PGD negotiators are smart people and I would guess they are using their full arsenal in any third party take-over talks, not just that unreasonable NPV for 6/7 they published. And they clearly admitted how conservative their post-tax NPV and IRR was. I summarized these previously, so have others.People on previous posts are correct. PGD does not care ...more  
Comment by pennyoilking on Nov 20, 2016 4:10pm
Okay so when can we expect that $3.00 a share buyout 
Comment by mill44 on Nov 20, 2016 7:01pm
"The PGD negotiators are smart people and I would guess they are using their full arsenal in any third party take-over talks, not just that unreasonable NPV for 6/7 they published." I hold PGD because I believe that your calculations are good, but I sweat bullets thinking that Robert could be the third party. I wonder how big  PGD's full arsenal is in that case?  
Comment by griefman on Nov 20, 2016 7:42pm
Ok, I don't have any "skin in the game" right now, but it doesn't mean I don't want to in the future or have an opinion or concern about what is transpiring, or not transpiring.  Simply, my concern is that we are at the mercy of the owners decisoin going forward and not the actual play anymore...the spec in the resource is not there anymore, it's the humans involved ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities