Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. PGDIF

"Peregrine Diamonds Ltd is a diamond exploration and development company with interests in diamond exploration properties located at Nunavut and the Northwest Territories in Canada and The Republic of Botswana."

GREY:PGDIF - Post Discussion

Peregrine Diamonds Ltd. > Massive share issue?
View:
Post by oiltar on Mar 08, 2017 6:39am

Massive share issue?

Sounds like Will is casting doubt on a financing.

"Unfortunately, the cash needed to pay for the drilling and the studying is also very much conceptual in nature. Peregrine says it is "in discussions with various parties" regarding financing the program, adding that it is "confident such financing will be obtained." Investors appear equally confident, although many retail shareholders are apprehensive that the financing obtained will be another rights offering at a hefty discount to the current stock price."

But lets say it goes threw (we don't want to see what happens if it don't but if it did not then BK) and the management cleans out the little treasury severence pay we still will need at least $10 million for exploration and G&A.

So lets sat PGD breaks with tradition and for once does the issue at the market price we get at least 50 million more shares.On the other hand if they follow regular issues and do it at 10 cents we get 100 million more shares taking the float to 450 million.

So any way I see it more tonnage of paper before more tonnage of ore.If not then PGD ends up in the grave yard of JR flame outs.I have had at least a dozen flame outs with near and some times 100% capital losses.

This situation is now very much at risk.But the only thing is RF and EF go down with us.Until we see the financing PGD is un-investible from a financial stand point.But from a gelogic stand point its the real deal.I VERY MUCH HOPE a major buys out PGD befor the till runs out or we issue a billion shares to keep this alive until then.

Its very clear JK bailed now..
Comment by cudjo on Mar 08, 2017 9:44am
damn I am good, hold your applause please, who is your daddy!  Under a dime, check, no winter program, check, Ollie stripes turning, check check and check etc etc etc. Now Ollie, before you go all cudjo on the board again, you need to consider a few things.  This issue will be for 7.5 million dollars, at a dime with a discounted rights offering, please please please, send daddy some love ...more  
Comment by mill44 on Mar 08, 2017 10:00am
No one can say that the Friedlands are idiots. There will be no massive amounts of shares made available to the public.
Comment by cudjo on Mar 08, 2017 10:05am
thanks mil, so do you think rights offering then?  Or PP by the brother or entity they have been talking to and believe if 500 meters does play nice, would ultimately be the one who came to a party?
Comment by mill44 on Mar 08, 2017 10:18am
According to Kaiser's numbers after the PEA, the fair value for PGD today would be between 40 to 60c. CH6 is fairly well understood, so te next step should not come with a big surprise to the downside. If someone made an offer above 30c, they should be all over this under 20c. Floodding the market with millions of shares would be a risky move. I don't see it happening.
Comment by Kidlapik on Mar 08, 2017 11:01am
I don't know how the Friedlands can add more to their position, they already own 47%, if there ownership increases more I believe they would be required to tender an offer for the entire company wouldn't they? They could do a rights offering but I do not believe they would be allowed to backstop it or oversubscribe do to their ownership %, I could be wrong. Ekim any thoughts here?
Comment by mill44 on Mar 08, 2017 11:20am
We might see them as the same group, but I am sure that legally, they are 2 different owners. All what I could find about more than 20% ownership was this: What Happens if I Become a 20% or Greater Shareholder? Do not become a 20% or greater shareholder without first speaking with Canadian legal counsel. Canadian securities laws prohibit acquisitions of outstanding securities of an issuer that ...more  
Comment by mill44 on Mar 08, 2017 11:36am
It does not seem that more than 20% or even 50% ownership is illegal for publicly traded companies. This article talks about absolute and effective control. https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjDnq67qMfSAhUE9WMKHcSQBTIQFghVMAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cpacanada.ca%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fsite%2Fbusiness-and-accounting ...more  
Comment by mill44 on Mar 08, 2017 11:38am
https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjDnq67qMfSAhUE9WMKHcSQBTIQFghVMAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cpacanada.ca%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fsite%2Fbusiness-and-accounting-resources%2Fdocs%2Fcontrolled-companies-briefing---questions-for-directors-to-ask.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF4fCh0PO5twO3wZkzMpZhWYBT4dA&bvm=bv.148747831,d.cGc
Comment by ekim on Mar 08, 2017 12:06pm
A private placement or Bought...Robert would not be able to participate in and he would absolutely be diluted with his position. Eric has a bit more wriggle room and may be able to participate at some %. They also couldn't do a standby agreement on a rights offering..they can exercise every single right they receive fairly...and not a single one after. They really need a third party here to ...more  
Comment by shneps on Mar 08, 2017 12:26pm
I have personally always felt that when Chantal was brought on board it was inevitably going to be a third party investment. That's her job, is it not? Too find someone?
Comment by mill44 on Mar 08, 2017 12:33pm
I consider the SP an issue for any third party investment. Even at 25c, to get the funds you would give someone 30M shares. Not the direction they steered this game till now.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities