Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Palliser Oil & Gas Corp. PSLRF

"Palliser Oil & Gas Corp is engaged in the exploration, development and production of petroleum including high netback heavy oil in the greater Lloydminster area of Alberta and Saskatchewan."

GREY:PSLRF - Post Discussion

Palliser Oil & Gas Corp. > Anderson type deal for Paliser could save it
View:
Post by 8675309Jenny on Jan 13, 2015 9:43am

Anderson type deal for Paliser could save it

Anderson has just done a deal with Freehold royalty, that could save Paliser and get it moving. Basically in the Anderson deal, they are selling 500 Boe/d of shallow gas assets, that have an engineering NPV value of 10m. In addition, the are getting 150M of Anderson's 370m of tax pools. (rounded). In other words they are paying 25m dollars for 150m of tax pools, or about 16c on the dollar. With Paliser holding over 100m of tax pools, this implies a value of 16-20m dollars for tax pools. Realizing this value could of course lower the bank debt, but equity is still required. at current prices, nothing works anyway
Comment by roscoe74 on Jan 13, 2015 10:26am
That could work if PXL can raise enough funds for capex to lower their operating (cash) costs to survive the downturn.-----The problem I see is that Freehold will have much better deals to choose from than PXL.
Comment by perdikaoilgas on Jan 23, 2015 9:26am
Yes that was an interesting deal that could possibly work for PXL.
Comment by perdikaoilgas on Jan 23, 2015 9:27am
But as you said FRU might have better deals to choose from.
Comment by roscoe74 on Jan 23, 2015 11:25am
What Palliser needs to do is lower their operating cost. At $30 - 35 /bbl op cost, PXL can not make money at $75 oil. Then they can sell some production with tax losses attached.
Comment by perdikaoilgas on Jan 24, 2015 4:16am
They have to lower the operating costs A LOT.  This is why, I never liked and never bought PXL because of its debt. They were using Cadillacs although a Chevy could do the job. 
Comment by roscoe74 on Jan 24, 2015 1:35pm
I dunno about that because the PXL geniuses are keeping very quiet about their execution of the business plan. ----- Pure speculation but my opinion is that they tried to pump too hard in order to meet guidance and broke into too much water. Then they had to advance drilling of disposal wells, they needed to heat too much production water to recover oil at the same time as a cold winter spiked ...more  
Comment by mexmillion1 on Jan 28, 2015 12:03pm
This has sure tanked since Sept/Oct...does anyone have any idea on the Maha merger...is it a go or not? Thanks GLTA
Comment by Oilmarket on Jan 28, 2015 4:36pm
More likely it will be a bank merger. Surprised they have not filed yet probably give it another few weeks. Their high volume pump is too expensive so if they shut it off to lower operating there goes that oil too. They were pumping masses of water.
Comment by righand2 on Jan 28, 2015 11:40pm
So why did you buy it, moron?
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities