Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Qsolar Ltd. QSLRF



GREY:QSLRF - Post by User

Comment by Stimulion Feb 10, 2015 9:12pm
125 Views
Post# 23416460

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Canadian Insider - Mr. Tapakoudes

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Canadian Insider - Mr. TapakoudesDear Mercurysmith,

Thank you so much, once again, for this defensible last synthesis. From the reading of it, however, there seems to me that 3 ways out are there for Q and each would have an impact on the retail shareholders' shares value. I wish you could help me figure the possible impacts of each option (s/p going up or down; maximum (+ or -) value of shares to be reasonably expected for each of the said scenarios should it come true; position suggested to retail holders (hold or sell) in each case).

Hyp #1: QSolar does not find necessary financial support (through substantial sales or loans) to maintain and consolidate its presence on the markets and has to file for bankrupcy ;

Hyp #2: QSolar is made a full buying offer (agressive or not) by a credible tier company that already operates successfully on the markets

Hyp #3: QSolar keep the sole property of intellectual rights on their technologies but sell their manufacturing and marketing rights to third parties against royalties

Any other opinions than Mercurysmith's will also greatly be welcomed.  
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>