Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Regent Ventures Ltd RGVNF

Regent Ventures Ltd is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral resources properties.


GREY:RGVNF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by curtisprodon Jul 17, 2006 11:31am
164 Views
Post# 11093186

RE: no reason for AGM questions

RE: no reason for AGM questionsAGM's are scripted. You vote for whatever is on the agenda...TRUE and THEN, after the AGM is officially closed you may be able to ask questions that, as has been posted will not be answered anyways. Maybe they won't be answered but they definitely won't be answered if THEY ARE NOT ASKED!!!! THAT KIND OF NEGATIVE ATTITUDE LEADS NOWHERE. Truthfully, there is only one question. Why is REV's stock price going down ...ASK THAT KIND OF GENERAL QUESTIONS WILL ONLY GET YOU GENERAL BS ANSWERS....BE SPECIFIC... when according to those who have posted information regarding the Polish concessions, there's trillions of cubic feet of gas, coal, CBM & oil. AND DON'T FORGET IT STOCKY... Oh, and did I mention the company is drilling Red Mountain that many have stated is worth at least .70 -.80 a share..HOW ABOUT WAITING FOR THE ASSAYS In contrast to Curtis, rewarding incompetence by giving them a pat on the back for having a stock that was .03, yes, three cents, in a booming mining market no less, and today sits at .30 + should not be applauded. I guess if you are a trader and the only criteria used for performance is where the stock sits in comparison to it's low you are doing great. BUT, how about those who bought at .60, .70, .80 and .90. Using the same criteria this stock sucks and is a loser...STOCKY, YOU TALK LIKE THE GAME IS OVER...YOU TALK LIKE YOU DON'T HAVE A GLASS HALF FULL...YOU HAD A FULL GLASS AND YOU SPILLED HALF OF IT.... GIVE REV/ED SOME CREDIT...WE ARE 10 TIMES UP FROM A YEAR AGO. WE HAVE A DEAL THAT IF THE FIGURES ARE CORRECT, WILL PROPEL US UP ANOTHER 10 TIMES SOON... Unfortunately if the criteria is perceived value based on assets or future assets we end up with the same conclusion. REALLY? It's time to stop rationalizing the price of the stock when it appears to be no more than a pump and dump. Time for the value of the deal to be shown in the stock price. CHARGES LIKE THAT ARE EASY TO MAKE AND DIFFICULT TO PROVE. MY MAIN POINT IS THAT IN MY NOT SO HUMBLE OPINION THE GAME ISN'T OVER...IT IS JUST BEGINNING...GIVE THEM A CHANCE...BUT...MAKE THEM AWARE THAT YOU ARE ON TOP OF THEM DEMANDING ANSWERS...AND AS I TRIED TO TELL YOU...NO TICKEE...NO LAUNDREEE...NO QUESTIONS....NO ANSWERS...... ASK ASK ASK.....
Bullboard Posts