Regent Ventures Ltd RGVNF

RE: Auditing the Books Is Wrong Issue

[curtisprod]

Monedas, you wrote: McCallans rules become Regent's rules becomes the exchanges rules because of the status as a publically held company

Okay,. Let us say we want to take over McCallan and in doing so REV must comply with exchange rules. 

What are the exchange rules? 

Do they require an audit of the books? 

If so then McCallan's books MUST be audited to comply with Exchange rules.

Will McCallan allow its books to be audited?

Just answer that simple question.  No double talk Chair. 

Do you know if McCallan will allow its books to be audited?

Nobody is accusing them, as you did Chair, of having books that are tainted.

Don't give me excuses or jibber jabber.

DO YOU BELIEVE THAT MCCALLAN SHOULD ALLOW THEIR BOOKS TO BE AUDITED?

DO YOU BELIEVE THAT MCCALLAN IS WITHHOLDING THEIR BOOKS FROM BEING AUDITED?

Can anybody just answer that simple question without pontificating?