Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Rio Alto Mining Limited RIOAF



GREY:RIOAF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by raisethebarron Sep 04, 2009 4:44pm
290 Views
Post# 16280342

RE: RE: RE: Chapada vs La Arena

RE: RE: RE: Chapada vs La ArenaOvis,
Thanks for your quick response. I understand that IAMGOLD have 10% because Rio could not raise the cash. I am not sure what you mean when you talk about a junior company being better positioned than a larger company to handle site challenges. What site challenges are you talking about? I don't understand what you mean that someone like Alex Black taking a LIMA listing would know how to make it happen? I would have thought that making it happen has nothing to do with a Lima listing, it will depend on the ability of the Rio team.  I hope he gets the opportunity to get the surface rights, without them there is nothing.
Raise
Bullboard Posts