Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Post by christopher11on Apr 28, 2017 11:26am
98 Views
Post# 26179475

the end

the endI did in fact look up the carrying charges of Dummont as per my prior post, apparently you missed reading that and some how just arbitrarily decided that the numbers were wrong or is it that you don't believe the auditors as well and have your own special accounting system. I am not sure but so be it. In my post however it was quite clear the burn rate- see note 9 to the audited financial statement is $3.894M plus all the admin that is buried in the P&L not directly attributable to the project so say approx. $4.5M in 2016. In any even your inability to put any rational arguments or numbers forward continuously whine and only find faults while not offering up any useful ideas or solutions is not helpful to anyone on here. Hence our discussion is now terminated. And yes i'm sure you will post yet another witty rebuttal that astounds all with your perceptive investing prowess Best of luck on your investments
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>