Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF



GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Comment by klondikekidon Sep 13, 2018 4:01pm
169 Views
Post# 28615473

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:In the CC

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:In the CC
My question is, you are refering to Hand of Faith as some analog for the RNX find when it is entirely different (hard rock vs placer).    And you state there was drilling conducted after with 3 holes drilled after finding no "HOF 2.0"

Where is the info about drill holes?    I am just questioning whether that statement can be backed up with some facts since you seem to be pretty big on them looking at your name. 

"Back at HOF
Three holes nearby 26, 13 and 34 grams per ton and no no HOF 2.0 was found."


Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=t.rnx&postid=28615137#8b3YQJhDeXufXCKO.99
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>