RE:Calling @CaffeinatedBaco re Bunting vidTimScrotis wrote: @CaffeinatedBaco like if you're still here
I am indeed! I've actually added another 15-20K shares in the past week. I'm just shy of 600K shares in RQB now (plus a bit less than that in warrants) and am really happy with the info that RQB is starting to release.
TimScrotis wrote: can you tell us what your thinkings are about the Edmonton pics and vids in the Mark Bunting & George interview So is it like much different from what you saw?
I mean, ya, that's the facility in more or less the same state I saw it. Just like I posted about a month ago now, the facility was all but finished. The parts they didn't show were the state of the previously unfinished rooms, the other mother room, and whether they cleaned up that back parking lot, lol.
TimScrotis wrote: At 0 min 35 sec is that a mother room?
One of them, yes. And it looks like the plants are substantially larger from when I saw them. When I was there, there was a more tiered look to the plants as they were at various stages of maturity. It looks like now they're all more or less at a consistent height (which I guess means they're taking clippings from the larger plants to keep them manageable and letting their smaller plants grow, but that's consistent with what I saw before: healthy, bushy, green plants ready to become new starters for the Orbital Gardens).
TimScrotis wrote: I am thinking you said you are infotech expert right so what are your thinkings about the computers and softwares at 0 min 52 sec?
Honestly, I can't see the specifics of the computers mattering at all. Computers/servers are more or less commodity pieces. That's like asking "What do you think of them using Chevron gas in their cars vs Shell?". Does Techron make a difference? Maybe, but not enough to say that using Shell is noteworthy either way.
The software, on the other hand, is part of what makes RQB more unique, I think. That brief picture you saw was of their monitoring software/station. From what I was told, it's what helps keep entry into their grow rooms down to ~5 times per grow cycle and keeps the rooms clean. They can monitor everything for each pod/cluster/room and the facility as a whole from that station and control everything, right down to the building environmental settings. Maybe that's bad for job prospects if you wanted to work for RQB (they need only a skeleton staff compared to flat top growing), but great for profits/investors.
That other whack-a-doodle that's on this board posting unsubstantiated nonsense about RQB, with clearly zero inside knowledge about how anything in the company works, is great for me. Scare people off so I can buy up more shares at pennies on the dollar. By the time people realize what they missed out on, I'll have enough cash to throw around that I can buy an Aston Martin to just park in my driveway, sporting a customized license plate that says "WD RULZ" ;)