Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF



GREY:SCSZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by vandenpon Nov 12, 2003 7:53am
196 Views
Post# 6637148

RE: "Where Are We Thinking?"

RE: "Where Are We Thinking?"Jase, I truly cannot understand how you cannot understand why there is a lack of sheer excitement regarding anything SCS says. I will try to explain it. It's because it's been YEARS of the SAME types of announcements which have resulted in adding NOTHING to the bottom line. YEARS Jase. YEARS of being burned over and over again by these misleading (IMO) announcements. Once again, hopefully this time is different from the last many many years of the same old same old, but we'll see. I will not be adding any more SCS shares to my portfolio until they are either in the teens or show concrete increases in revenue. And regarding "Solars just announced results ended 9 months, August 31st 2003 - gross profit was $156,918.00." IMO, just another misleading (IMO) NR. Why did they not tell us what the NET profits were and, why did they require MORE dilution of shares? Actions like this NR do not help the share price in the long run. Anyway, how (after all these years) you can still be surprised at the sheer lack of excitement absolutely blows my mind.
Bullboard Posts