GREY:SGGDF - Post by User
Comment by
GoCash1on Sep 05, 2008 5:26pm
255 Views
Post# 15435121
RE: Big title but many zero samples trenching...
RE: Big title but many zero samples trenching...Hey Ricky.....sometimes some of your posts contain some good info,but I got to tell ya,this last one shows that you really don't make much sense after all......there might have been a few "zeros" like you said.......but you cannot discount the fact that these channel samples are only 3 foot cuts of rock that are on the surface......one 3 foot surface channel cut measured over 4ozs of gold per ton.....that is spectacular to say the least.....what lies 6 feet below that surface sample or maybe 50 meters below it????or maybe there was just a 4oz. splash of gold and nothing else??? come on Ricky,give your head a shake......Why continue to bash SGX anyway???? I have lost faith in management myself,but I have my reasons......I asked management quite a while back on AG---is or was there "visible gold" in any of the channel or grab samples,but they refused to answer and kinda dodged the question entirely....I can see why now,since they actually wanted to buy more stock thru private acquisitions on the cheap.....then low and behold...**poof** there is "visible gold" at Jacobus....eventually when they drill Jacobus East(provided they can still afford to) they might actually hit the same kind of grades that KXL hit,maybe not......but really--if they found a channel cut containing 4 ounces of per ton,do you think that it is all that is there? I think not. The problem with SGX is the share count,and how high are they going to run it up...at 15 cents this company is a bargain,for an easy double or triple just on Jacobus speculation alone,and there is still Onoman and it's 43-101.....Quit smoking the pot Ricky and sober up before you bash SGX any further,give us a break from retarded posts for awhile.....and post things that actually make sense from now on.....GOCASH p.s. or you won't be my hero anymore LOL