Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Southern Pacific Resource Corp STPJF

Southern Pacific Resource Corp. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in the thermal production of heavy oil in Senlac, Saskatchewan on a property known as STP-Senlac, and thermal production of bitumen on a property located in the Athabasca region of Alberta known as STP-McKay, as well as exploration for and development of in-situ oil sands in the Athabasca region of Alberta. Its STP... see more

GREY:STPJF - Post Discussion

Southern Pacific Resource Corp > Well Performance
View:
Post by Risky_Business on Jun 23, 2014 2:21pm

Well Performance

I was golfing with an engineer from AOS last week.  Started talking about STP.  He says STP got too cute with the drilling of the well pairs...ie....they tried to get too close to the bottom of the pay zone and imposed extra technical risk on the project.

Anyone else hear this as well?

RB
Comment by nikehercules on Jun 23, 2014 4:20pm
Yes, that is the case. My contact went on to blame Lutes for the mess. Chad Harris may have been fired back in November 2013 but Lutes bears ultimate responsiblity for going with such a bold design on a new and unknown reservior. Good news is they probably won't do it again, I hope......
Comment by Eyeinvestor on Jun 24, 2014 5:04pm
Yes I have heard this several times about Pad 1. To a lesser extent on Pad 2. The company has admitted it made a mistake with Pad 1. Pad 1 was an unmitigated disaster. The separation of injection and production wells was too great, and the varying contours of the production well trying to catch every last puddle of bitumen simply didn't work. ICD on one of the wells has started to help, but ...more  
Comment by scatterhead on Jun 24, 2014 7:50pm
Good 'EYE'
Comment by PeakOilBoy on Jun 24, 2014 11:42pm
When exactly did the company admit pad 1 was finally a mistake?  Details?  Eye wonder if you talk to people eye don't?   Eye seem to think you are confident about this.  
Comment by nikehercules on Jun 25, 2014 12:31pm
PeakOilBoy - Head over to slide 70 on the most recent AER presentation. Scheme Performance Key Learnings -Implement tighter lateral inter well pair spacing on future drills. -Reduce Producer and Injector wellbore spacing. -Keep consistent separation between Producer and Injector wellbores. -Potentially implement HPSS with a balanced differential pressure early in a wells life. -Install ICD’s ...more  
Comment by Eyeinvestor on Jun 25, 2014 6:41pm
Eye don't want to overstate this, so let me rephrase and say: Implicit in some of their comments are an admission that they made a mistake on the design of Pad 1. For example, they say things like, if we were doing it again, we would do it differently. Meye view is that Pad 2 is a better guide to what McKay is capable of in the future with new wells drilled with pre-installed ICDs. Even Pad ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities