Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum SilverCrest Mines Inc SVLC

NYSEAM:SVLC - Post Discussion

SilverCrest Mines Inc > Significant growth over next 4 years
View:
Post by TRRG on Nov 07, 2013 9:06pm

Significant growth over next 4 years

Silvercrest Mines is an emerging Mid-Tier producer. They are producing 2.5 million oz of silver equivalent (silver, gold, and copper), and are expanding production at their flagship Santa Elena mine in Mexico in 2013 and 2014. Then they have two more projects under development: Cruz de Mayo (2015) and La Joya (2016). So, they have significant growth planned for the next four years. They will reach 5 million equivalent ounces. And their costs are low. Plus, their market cap is only $265 million fully diluted. 
 
It looks great using those numbers, but I don’t have them as a top pick. Why not? Their total M&I silver resources are only 16 million oz. They have 114 million inferred, but they are low grade. They have 1 million oz of gold, but 800,000 oz are inferred and low grade. Thus, they need to have exploration success to sustain the growth that they are planning. Also, they are using Sandstorm for financing, with 25% of gold production going to them for $350. And they are using Sandstorm for financing their two new mines. So, I expect more hedging. Also, they are counting on copper demand in the long term. They have 500 million lbs of copper and that is a significant part of their cash flow at Santa Elena. 
 
With their growth they will probably be a 3 bagger, but more than that is speculation. And they are going to need copper to hold up. I don’t like the risk of betting on copper in the long term. The key for this stock long term (as is true for many mining stocks) will be their exploration results. They need to find more resources to extend the mine life and expand production.
Comment by scott on Nov 07, 2013 11:50pm
"...And they are using Sandstorm for financing their two new mines." Just curious, where did you hear this? Scott Drever said publicly fairly recently that Sandstorm made sense when developing Santa Elena, but that they weren't likely to use them going forward. Have you learned someting different? Cheers! Scott And they are using Sandstorm for financing their two new ...more  
Comment by ch08532 on Nov 08, 2013 9:07am
I personally don't look at copper as a downside risk.  Actually, it's more of a benefit for them going forward now that the new proposed tax laws include royalties on Gold, Silver and Platinum.  Copper wouldn't be subjected to the royalty.  I don't see much downside risk in Copper demand...copper is hovering above it's 10 year low and demand from China and other ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities