Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF



GREY:SWFCF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by marketmineron Jul 25, 2007 7:33pm
156 Views
Post# 13151323

Just suppose?

Just suppose? As I said all along the bashers have to have a motive for being here..... Liability mitigation? They say there is no short liability... so I believe them. They post for months on end, so aquiring a position is not the answer either, as they have had ample time to cover a short, or build a position, heck I've added another 300K shares over the past couple months. That leaves paid for bashing by the likes of Debeers... Naaa that would just not be profesional.... I doubt they would do that. Another motive could be a vendictive act.... now if these guys are jilted lovers I would have thought they would post a couple dozen times and get lost... they would also post on other boards where they actually have investments...No they choose to hide and post only their negative toxic sludge. They are hiding their other investments... or are being paid by someone with a motive in keeping SNO in difficulty... Hoping to make it difficult for Bob to raise money... to kill the project, bury SNO then the potential liabilty would disappear....JMHO What liabilty you ask? Suppose that SNO is successfull and Mud proves to be a minable deposit and a buyout offer of say $500 million is presented to SNO holders.. This brings up some interesting questions.... Like why did CGW bail out on the project after only a couple months... If I was a CGW shareholder I would be ticked...and would be asking CGW managment WTFIGO They had the JV in place to be a 50% partner in the SNO properties, all they had to do is pay their portion of the work completed. Why is important for some ... all of the bashers, that SNO fails.... could there be a liability issue from the standpoint of our former partners managment?.....LOL Provide some other reason for your continued presence bashers..... or I will just have to take my deduction as the motive for your continued desperate attempts to destroy the credability of this project. No aqusations, just looking for an explanation for your continueing to trash the project and individual investors. Just give me one valid reason that will stand the scuteny of rational thought!
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse