Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Snowfield Development Corp. SWFCF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:SWFCF - Post by User

Snowfield Development Corp.
Bullboard Posts
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by kosokowon Feb 11, 2005 10:50am
163 Views
Post# 8574502

RE: Bulk vs core samples

RE: Bulk vs core samplesTrue. But I'm sure you could think of a few plays that were killed by a poor diamond count or size distribution. There is no question this is diamondiferous. The chemistry tells us that. Management will let this live or die by the larger bulk sample instead of small core samples. I like their stategy. Ted
Bullboard Posts
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities