Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Uranium One Inc SXRZF



GREY:SXRZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by howdy1on Apr 01, 2011 3:02am
643 Views
Post# 18371394

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE If your message earlier today was directed to me, please let's get some things very straight, now that these claims are being made in the public domain.
.
Yes, I have praised you in past posts, when your commentary was not so negative.  But I have never communicated with you through your inbox as your statement purports.
.
Your claim that you posted on the BBD.B board is absurd.  We all know that this simply is not true.  Or is there another alias in play?
.
The fact that you are bearish does not make you the enemy.  That is a point of view and that is what the market is all about.  It is the way you play in the sandbox, let's call it unsportsmanlike conduct, that rankles me.   
.
You constantly try to legitimize and promote your "authority" as a commentator by either patting yourself on the back or putting others down.  Lately, you have taken every opportunity to suggest that you are a nuclear insider and that just goes too far.  
.
I won't even get into my perception here that you are part of a team that is larger than yourself (and Membership1).
.
It amazes me how your daily perspective on what is going on in Fukushima is a daily microcosm of that day's news.  For instance, when the word "lava" was being used to describe the contents of the RPV in the day's press, coincidently, you were using the same word.  But on that day only.   One in your supposed shoes would, no doubt, have perspective that was a little more broad and would hopefully add value to the news--not regurgitate it ad nauseum day in and day out--with a clear agenda.
.
Somehow I doubt you finger type with 1 hand and never proof.  I doubt that you are that quiet granola munching academic lecturer/nuclear power plant uber-trainer that you purport to be.  
.
Given your behavior and smugness, I would peg you to be working in a boiler room pumping out these posts as piecework--with full knowledge of your master's market strategy.  I submit that when you talk about your "field that is your actual day job", you are talking about market participation, and not electricity generation.  
.
Looking  at this post of yours that I am replying to, the current strategy is obviously to try to repair your tarnished image by appealing to people's human side with all of your personal references.  The work of a manipulator extraordinaire, I am sorry to say.  After all, you have invested lots of time in grooming this crowd.  Why wouldn't you try to regain your "status."
.
I know that this is an anonymous forum and there is not a reasonable expectation of truth, but out and out BS has to be called.  Enough.  I am no longer fooled.
Bullboard Posts