Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Uranium One Inc SXRZF



GREY:SXRZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by howdy1on Apr 05, 2011 6:20pm
286 Views
Post# 18389935

RE: RE: RE: RE: better control

RE: RE: RE: RE: better controlPsyche, to save you and the board a whole lot of time and energy, let's just cut to the chase. No need to put it out in dribs and drabs. https://www.financialsense.com/user/173
.
By now most of us understand the thesis. Nuclear, bad--everything else, good.
.
The question that I have is this: given the limited downside of this stock and the supposed extreme upside of solar/thorium/wind/tidal/iodine pill producing/hazmat suit producing/gas/oil etc/ plays in this macro environment persay, why don't you simply cover your short and go long in any one of those plays?
It would seem that the guaranteed reward there is just too tasty to pass up--not to put words into your mouth :)
Bullboard Posts