RE: Gotta admit it LouE...It would be nice if LouE could use his account name. Unfortunately, he answered his most eloquent bit of self-serving history revision yet--under an alias. Obviously directed at me. Gee LouE, I guess you didn't realize that I had that alias on ignore when you wrote that one. Just happened to stumble onto it going through the posts while logged out. More sneakiness.
.
You have a funny take on disclosure. Disclosure usually happens BEFOREHAND, is FRONT AND CENTRE, and usually happens VOLUNTARILY. Let's just say that yours come pretty late--and only after the noise starts. And then you make out like the people who call you on it are the bad guys.
.
Your take on my holdings and timing on this stock are so far wrong it hurts. Your untruthful contention that I came onto this board to attack you is just plain nonsense. If people want to look, they will see the record. I used to respect what you had to say until you started really going off the deep end. THAT is when I started to question what you do. My record speaks for itself and I do not need to try to revise history an try to spin it for convenience today.
.
If you had it your way, you would say "buy" and this whole board would buy. Then you would say "sell" and this whole board would follow that too. Could this whole board really have sold the other day at $4.17 like you so mockingly said we all should have? Could we all have bought at $3.45?
.
The answer is obvious, yet you make out like these points are predictable and that anyone here can do it--if only they follow you. You come to this board to try to cultivate lemmings that ought to follow your every move. It is no longer about helping anyone, it is all about trying to create a herd of followers through psychological warfare. Your very eloquent last post is a case in point. It is much like a late night info-mercial for a fail-safe trading system. Might this create opportunities for you--that you can make money from? It is certainly not about credible fundamental analysis. If these characters of yours are so interchangeable, why is there need for a post like this:
https://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?sv=1&m=29098394&l=0&r=0&s=UUU&t=list ?
.
And as for your comparison to Deacan, Deacan truly was good humour. He never tried to make out that he was anything less than jokingly nudging people to RSC. He was not caustic and he did not get into the game of calling people names when they did not agree with him. He had a certain honesty in his pumping in that he never tried to make it anything more than a joke.
.
Lastly, I never, ever have tried to get people to follow me. I don't want or need a following. Following someone's trading advice is a dangerous thing--especially someone with so many different personalities.
.
So get over yourselves, LouE and co. Or maybe this forum should be renamed LouE.com.