RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:That’s one long corner AFN is turningLol.....Obviously I have hit a sore bone..... keep up the good work posting the yo yo analysis reports that means so much to you.....Motley Fool's are great to read too. You win the keyboard hero battle. Over and out my analytical friend.
SunsetGrill wrote: Oh and another thing - it may have been after the bin failure but recall the intial costs were 20-30 then was upped sometime later to 75mill. And the icing on this big cake - apparantly you read the Scotia report in March targeting $50 WHY ON EARTH WOULD YOU DO THAT!! Its all BS right.. Shooting yourself in the foot dont ya think.
DId you read the August report targeting 37
SunsetGrill wrote: Its so clear ive been hurt (taking a few liberties there are you) - so you just buy stocks without any targets, if that were true - what makes you be a buyer in the 20's there has to be some reasoning other you just being right all the time
RayDonovan78 wrote: You can try and spin it anyway you like but it is total nonsense.....Scotia's March 2021 report of $50 was well after the bin failures and they said "2021 looked quite favorable" Did you actually read the report ? I don't give price targets or buy a stock on targets but I am looking forward to buying more should it drop back into the $20's. Clearly you got hurt on this one relying on analyst targets, AG is a good company and not going anywhere so someday you will get back even. Best of luck
SunsetGrill wrote: OK Ray Ray - does time not tick by in your world. Things are constently evolving and changing. Im pretty sure most people we saying dont buy ANYTHING at the onset of the covid pandemic.not just banks. I dont follow analysts, i read what they have to offer. and the data presented, then make my own decision.
Were
all the costs for the bin failures in at the time you site when they were all way off. Was
Covid a VERY LARGE uncertaintly around future earnings? Gee I would think so.
All the analysts are wrong all the time about every company. Let me quess you are an anti-vaxer too? and planes did not hit the world trade center, right?.
What exactly is your target for AG Growth?. Please do not only provide your target but how are you getting to that target.
RayDonovan78 wrote: Exactly my point !! Analyst price targets are meaningless and are rarely met as most have an agenda. Their targets from 6 months ago were WAY off. My all time favorate is March/April 2020 when all the talking heads said do not touch the Canadian banks and oil will never be over $40 a barrel again. Someone need to get it together and it clearly isnt me. Best of luck following your Analysts.
SunsetGrill wrote: Ya I guess so - since Scotia last qrt target report target was $37 and the one from a few days ago has a $38 target. So along with you , Scotia also doesnt think there $50-70 targets aint going to happen. Cmon dude get it together
RayDonovan78 wrote: Huckleberry or not..... RBC, Scotia and Nationals $50-$70 targets from last March are not going to happen. If it doesn't go back to the high 20's, oh well I got my fill a couple weeks ago and if it does I will buy more. Best of luck.
SunsetGrill wrote: LOL - You're correct I'd much rather get my company information and insight from some Huckleberry posting on Stockhouse It's pretty easy to say buy in the 20s when looking at a chart which is "historic" - and what if it doesn't get to the 20s again?
RayDonovan78 wrote: Huge debt and litigation over their head. long term hold if you can pickup shares again in the high $20's. Not a buyer in the $30's, wouldn't buy on analyst ratings or there price targets, most have an agenda.