Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Ag Growth International Inc T.AFN

Alternate Symbol(s):  T.AFN.DB.F | T.AFN.DB.G | T.AFN.DB.H | T.AFN.DB.I | T.AFN.DB.J | AGGZF

Ag Growth International Inc. is a provider of the equipment and solutions required to support the storage, transport, and processing of food globally. The Company provides equipment solutions for agriculture bulk commodities, including seed, fertilizer, grain, rice, feed, and food processing systems. It has manufacturing facilities in Canada, the United States, Brazil, Italy, France, and India... see more

TSX:AFN - Post Discussion

Ag Growth International Inc > Uncomfortable
View:
Post by Maxmoe on Nov 07, 2022 1:26pm

Uncomfortable

Tim close is obviously not retiring. He's a young man with an enviable track record in an otherwise dull industry. So why no discussion of where he's going and why? If it was just a huge paycheck with a global giant he couldn't resist I get it.  Maybe he's going back to GE? Deere? Is he going to poach talent from afn wherever he lands? Should the "transition" have been for the chairman rather than the ceo? Was their a battle in the boardroom? As for the pivot from tuck in geographic and product line acquisitions to cost cutting and reducing debt, I'm not a big fan. Yet another Canadian company that plods along focused on costs rather than market share and growth ? Zzzzz.  I've seen many companies, mostly American, that push growth strategies and crush their meek Canadian competitors. Or completely fail. It doesn't always payoff. BUT, I don't see manufacturers that cut costs and cut debt all the way to the top. More like a slow self fulfilling spiral down. Like GE after Walsh left. So, what happened here last summer with this "transition"? Anyone have some insight? Or "the dirt" ? Don't need opinion. I already have my own poorly underinformed opinion.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities