Almonty Industries Inc T.AII

RE:RE:RE:RE:Two Totally Separate Process Plants For Tungsten And Molly !

[QuarterDollar]

• Forgive my ignorance 5ilver, but a mine having its own entrance at the opposite side of a hill seems to me it will have its own shafts that are not shared as the Moly is 150 meters below the tungsten. [ If shafts were shared, the only one that could be shared is the virtical shaft, and if you are sharing the virtical shaft, then why would Moly need its own entrance?]
• It appears to me the Moly will be its own separate mine entrance with its own separate infrastructure. Actually, I don't mind if they are independent mines, but I quess my question comes down to this, what percentage of the costs will be shared between the operation and build of the two mines.  Is it 5%? 10%? or more?  At the moment, this percentage doesn't seem very high to me.
• I think if LB can get a 20%-35% cost saving between the two mines would be awesome, but what do I know. I just want to know what that percentage is.
• The only areas of cost savings I see are administration, connecting mine shafts between the two mines to transport loaders, and drillers and other mining equipment between the mines. I think this would happen while one of the mines was down for maintenance. 
• I am not very curious about the build out of the Sangdong tungsten mine, nor the downstream plant as both seem straight forward to me. But I am curious about the Moly mine and the execution of cost saving measures. There is something about this that is peaking my interest.
• LB is really a stickler for cost savings so I am very confident he will accomplish this. 

• Actually, I have another question......if Moly will have its own equipment, will Almonty have to invest another $75M + the cost of inflation?  I guess it is a little early to be asking this question. Hopefully we can get an answer in a year's time.