Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Ascot Resources Ltd T.AOT

Alternate Symbol(s):  AOTVF

Ascot Resources Ltd. is a development and exploration company. The Company operates through two segments: the development of the Project and exploration and evaluation of Mt. Margaret. It is focused on re-starting the past producing Premier gold mine located in British Columbia's Golden Triangle. The Silver Coin, Big Missouri, and Premier deposits, collectively known as the Premier Gold Project (PGP) are located near the processing facility on the Premier Mine site. The PGP covers about 8,133 hectares (ha). Its Red Mountain Project (RMP) is located 23 kilometers (km), southeast in an adjacent valley. RMP consists of about 47 contiguous mineral claims for a total of approximately 17,125 ha. Its Premier and Red Mountain Gold Projects supply gold and silver ores to the process plant. It also has two other properties, including Swamp Point, an aggregate project located in British Columbia and Mt. Margaret, a porphyry copper-molybdenum-gold-silver deposit located in United States.


TSX:AOT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by halcroon Sep 13, 2015 7:36pm
216 Views
Post# 24100437

Brent Cook, Eric Coffin and Rob McLeod

Brent Cook, Eric Coffin and Rob McLeod Chris Parry, Stockhouse.com August 27, 2015 On Ascot Resources (TSXV:AOT, Forum) / Pretium Resources (TSX:PVG, Forum): MCLEOD: Ascot Resources is the real deal. Historically at Premier, the mine was highly profitable for multiple decades mining the spectacular grades of the recent drilling. Structurally, the ultra-high-grade have seemed complex in the modern era, but I believe their geo team has it sorted out. I used to work in the mill at Premier when I was an undergrad, and they had these historic stacks of 'curved level plans'; never seen anything like it since. High grade veins at Pretium could do something similar. Start flat, then curve vertical like a fishhook. COOK: I suspect Brucejack makes money. I have commented on it in detail in EI. The question is, is it like Ascot where small-time miners could do really well following the HG or will taking it all work? The bigger question is, is it worth $800mil? I don't know and I suspect no one knows what is there until it is all mined. Rob care to weigh in? MCLEOD: Risk on Pretium is they run the risk of overbuilding; unquestionably spectacular grade, but need some underground mining years under their belt to truly reconcile head grade to resource. Concern is that they want to build a 4000 tpd plant (I think), when they should start up with lower capex and indirect and scale up. Nothing wrong with a 2,000 tpd operation producing 300,000+ ounces per year... Rumour has it that PVG project financing will be announced imminently. Haven't heard where the $ is coming from. Work scheduled to commence on power line; forecast is mixed rain and snow in Stewart this weekend. September is usually 'nice' though. COOK: I would guess all the major miners have reviewed PVG in detail. So far none have bought, that may say something.? The Chinese group came in and I would guess will again. Now for those that own a $900mil gold developer, what does it take to double the share price? There have to be better options to own for a double. I think Brucejack is a deposit that we will know what's there when it is mined over a year or two. There is a philosophical split in the resource estimation world on how statistics are used vs. geology. Farquharson is old-school miners. Snowden is young computer jockeys. I tend to go w/ the rocks before stats. MCLEOD: On rocks before stats; most majors doing the resource DD will put the stats before the rocks with their own in-house resource guys, who are typically conservative. Too much variation in what the true head grade would be to give any major a good comfort. One of the majors that does know ultra-high grade at Red Lake has passed through Stewart multiple times over the past couple of years. Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/news/newswire/2015/08/27/brent-cook-eric-coffin-and-rob-mcleod-reveal-their-thoughts-on-dozens-junior#ma66BzF6AZYuLDSg.99 Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.bgm/barkerville-gold-mines-ltd#IerJ2alcdMsYcUQz.99
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse