RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:split gcm into share holding company and segovia"
not give you anything for them. "
but they are giving you something for them, the holding company holding the shares, which should rise in price because it is mostly aris shares. shareholders still get the two assets.
why do you think aris shares are more valuable inside gcm rather than outside?
we already know aris shares are given little value inside gcm.
long term, what do you think gcm does with the aris shares?
sell those shares for cash and put it in an explore company that many people are against?
why not let the shareholders decide what they want to do, keep the aris shares or sell for cash and let the shareholder decide what to do with the cash, instead of being forced to hold some explore project that they have no say in?
menoalittle wrote: >> companies spin out non-core assets all the time.
oh, so as a shareholder, you'd be okay if the company decides to spin those assets out and not give you anything for them. why should they, if they're as you say, "non-core" assets?