RE:RE:RE:What is the scenario StockingUp21 wrote: I bet 90% of people who invest here did not know they don't own IP. So shady. Almangement working for themselves on the side before this while we fund research.
GameChangerBet wrote:
Notthatbright wrote: should the shareholdres vote against amalgamation?
You certainly want to amalgamate. You want your shares to own the IP.
Any potential future aquiring event will likely require the IP, package deal.
In addition to that, you absolutely want senior management to own the same common shares you do, as opposed to owning shares in AH where they sit back and collect royalties that ATE would have owed them from future sales. Everyone is now on the same page.
What's good for the bosses, will be good for us shareholders.
Don't confuse lack of adequate work to understand exactly what you're investing in with the word shady.
I imagine you simply assumed they owned the IP? Didn't bother to check? Didn't know to even check? Didn't know it was even a thing?
These are not signs of shady, these are signs of not having a complete understanding of what you invested in.
All information was, and is public.
This is not a blame game, it is a matter of responsibility of understanding your investment.
I bet when brokerages were involved with them to do financings, they surely knew about the Holding company. You know why? Beacuse institutions do their work thoroughly before dropping a dime.
Get it?
Institution vs Retail
One knows exactly what the fine print states, the other makes decisions on how they feel that day.