RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Can anyone explain? @Clarence; In as much as all news from AVO, good or bad had been twisted around until it sounded negative it could be. However, usually any hint of a split has the opposite effect. Right or wrong I suspected Raymond James as being one who who was involved in manipulating this stock. Now I learned from a report, I don't remember what kind of a report, that an exemployee of Raymond James was hired by AVO. So was I wrong, did things change or is it just a coincidence?
I would like to know. Do I understand you right when I more or less assume that what you mention in your scrambled posting is that you wonder what I believe is the cause of this poor performance ( If indeed you can call it poor ) is of a positive nature, I'm glad that you understand that I can't explain why I think the stock was abused except greed but i'm sure it will be positive. What I'm not sure is how long it will take to see it happen.