RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Hitachi /Bombardier near i bil us contract you are the guy missing the point , he's the one claimning that thebomber's balance sheet told him to sell his shares at a minimal profit way back when , then he bought stornaway( and others) and LOST EVERYTHING... and for your information if you don'r sell the shares at a loss you haven't lost anything ... what if the the bomber gets a huge contract with some new technology/product and partners up ? .. my point is anything can happen if you are still in business and always innovating ... he's wrong because he was stating that the bomber would go bankrupt years ago ( actually he still says so continuously) .. he's wrong because he lost his money on his own advice which he tries to give to others ... I told you before , I trust ME , no balance sheet , no PR statements , no LOI my information talls me they will not go bankrupt ... had they wanted to skrew investors they could have made a boatload of cash wiping out shareholders and buying back the bits and pieces for a song , they decided to go another route ... the family has much more pride than that , something some people might be looking for on a balance sheet but won't find it ... BTW , I lost money on NT years ago , I had a financial advisor who read balance sheets/ his mother's bass and he made me loss a good chunk of cash ... the difference is I don't go around preaching that this stock or that stock will go bankrupt ... keep following his advice , you too could become old broke and miserable ... GLTA
Jim99999 wrote: Seriously, are you five years old? "He's not right because he got some other thing wrong!"
bicente wrote: can you please look at his other "investments" ..his other "investments" went BANKRUPT , how much more wrong can a person be ? ..at least we are still here waiting for the bomber to get their chit together , and it will happen ... meanwhile he is twidling his thumbs and picking his nose because he has no more money to invest anywhere... how can you say he was right ??? ... GLTA
flamingogold wrote: Whatever the motive, he's been right at calling this a dog and longs like us have been dead wrong.
bicente wrote: Pierredowner has to wait until the next balance sheet in order to process this new contract and include it in his expert analysis ... he must be so pissed to have sold the bomber shares lower than it's high ( over $5 ) and lost that money on his clever "investments" that went bankrupt ...it must e eating away at his insides to see that not even covid couls sink the bomber ...I feel bad for him , some people think they are smarter than others but end up broke because of their over-inflated head ... GLTA
clubhouse19 wrote: Clueless and just a waste of SKIN that only a mother can love .
LOL
Was the baglog down because they completed some contracts that have gone into receivables ??
Book to fill ratio is 1.1
Meaning they were able to refill with new orders
This new order adds to that fill ratio.
Did you forget this lebel...of course you did !!
raphaelle2 wrote: Obsolete info. 11 August Today! Are you clueless or just looking for attention. Probably a bit of both...
.
pierrelebel wrote: Shamorish wrote "we do not hear media saying that Alstom may increase bidding price for bbd since BT has added so many contracts to its backlog"
According to the financials reported by Bombardier last week (page 6) the backlog at BT is down by more than US$2 billion from December 31 2019 to June 30, 2020 ($35.8 to $33.7 billion)
LINK to Bombardier Financials