RE:RE:RE:OT: The RussianPinotblanc wrote: ManyQuestions wrote: This is off topic, but I can't not respond. There is no logic to your own response. You assume that because voters didn't hear that it was propoganda until after the election that they somehow wouldn't be influenced before--think about that. You also assume that hearing that the Democrats were hacked automatically generates sympathy--well, no, it would depend upon what was hacked, wouldn't it?
I want to adress this because I still read quite fast for the reply I made. Democrats do not think it is or was propaganda. Even after Cohen testimony, they don't think this is propaganda, they are liberals. So, let's just forget about the propaganda for a minute.
The question I ask, is how the Russian "supposedly" influenced the election. I ask only one question, not if Trump plays too much golf. I want one, not two, one person who was influenced for not voting for Clinton because of the Russian, since she attribuated her lost to the Russian. I would never vote "green", but if I thought the party was hacked by the Russian, I would not still vote "green", but I would sympathise with the party because it is not OK to be hacked. So, I never took the Russian affair seriously, even Clubby could not answer the question. He put me on ignore instead. :p