RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Alstom -BTYou missed me you idiot. But what else can be expect from an idiot like you. You hate CDPQ but you want to work with them. You think rail is not a cash drsin but are ignoring the last q report. Now do you get it that rail must be sold off.
pablo87 wrote: Very interesting crowd - bicente, clubhouse19, stockitnow, raphaelle, did I miss any? LOL
clubhouse19 wrote: Truly nonsensical as you said...but since he made such a nonsensical probabilty, I figured he would have done his homework and figured out how it could be done LOL ?
bicente wrote: Don't try to figure it out , it's a nonsensical waste of time energy and money to spin off right before selling a division ... btw , trains is getting stronger day by day , they are fixing all the problems and getting the job done , by the time the closing date is reached , BT will be worth more and a premium will have to be paid for the contracts signed until then ... it's called adjustments , they are dine all the time at the signing , don't listen to all the quacks on this board who have been to the notary once in their life and think that the balance sheet will tell them the futur ... glta
uote=clubhouse19]Interesting...but what would have been the value of BA if BT was separated before any selling of BT ? If BT was separate entity, what would the share structure be and the value of each.
Separate entity means a spin off with its own identity while. What scenario would you envisage that BA would have the right to the proceeds from the selling of BT ?
A spin off just for the sake of selling bt...I don't get it !!
pablo87 wrote: A deal like this (a desperate selling party in a weak global economy) with such a prolonged and conditional close puts the seller not only in a very weak position vis a vis the buyer but also in the marketplace - the competition - both transportation and aviation - must be having a field day.
Like I said (and I was lambasted for it by the usual suspects), there was a need for an interim step where a) BT was fully separated from BA and b) it was on a solid footing financially so that it didn't matter whether the deal with Alstom closed or not. It wasn't the time for the usual Bombardier hubris and CDPQ 15% bull~!@# but what can I say? Par for the course.
Global7500 wrote: Alstom Signals BBD Rail Arm Losses to Affect Takeover . What if Bombardier reported gains from BT ? Would Alstom have thought of reconsidering the deal ? ...i think they are just trying to get it for free as Airbus did with Cseries ..
[/quote]