3 things that I wonder about...Notes
(1) Mineralized true thicknesses are 60 to 100 per
cent of stated thicknesses. The calculation of drill
intercepts employs a 0.3-gram-per-tonne cut-off, and
no cutting grade has been applied to high gold values.
- So does this mean that there is a cut off on low grade to ensure that excess low grade (under .3g/t in this case) doesnt weigh to heavily on the average but anything higher grade, like .5m of 1000000 g/t isnt capped and plays into the average as reported?
(2) Not all drill holes identified in this release
have had a full sample submission completed as
planned, as a prioritized system of sample submission
has been introduced due to the previously identified
sample backlog. Additional significant results will
be released and posted as received.
- I find it odd where and when the gaps in the drilling has occured, though I do not know what to make of this.
(3) True thickness not yet determined.
Interesting, you have to wonder why not report these in their true thickness...seems most cos I follow do.
Anyone have any thoughts or some educated answers for a non geo...