RE: hmmmmmNot sure i'd expect them to say anything otherwise.... in my opinion the good thing about that is SOC is not mentioning anything about CAN... as we said before if they have a problem it's with the Dr. (who i think got 700,000 of SOC) the question burning in my mind was and is... did the Dr. scam SOC?? and now he has the shares..lol Also SOC recently raised money didn't they? perhaps on the premise of this option agreement being valid? It is still interesting that the Dr. is the holder of the "license" has he made any attempts to get the gov't order overthrown? it would seem the license is his so he should be defending it, no? Is the Grocer in a tight spot? Isn't the gov't decree now law? and suing the gov't is like peeing in the pool... just my opinions..