Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. T.COS


Primary Symbol: V.COS Alternate Symbol(s):  CNBMF

Coniagas Battery Metals Inc. is a Canada-based exploration and mining company. The Company is focused on nickel, copper, and cobalt in northern Quebec. It is advancing Graal Nickel & Copper Project. The Graal Nickel & Copper Project (the Property) is located in the north of Saguenay Lac St-Jean region. It is comprised of 110 map-designed claims covering 6,113 hectares. The Property is also located at 190 kilometers (km) north from the seaport terminal of Grande-Anse (Saguenay).


TSXV:COS - Post by User

Post by FootballFan1on Nov 27, 2015 1:55pm
157 Views
Post# 24332348

COS Board / Management Messed This Up

COS Board / Management Messed This Up
Here's my take on the situation: COS had the 60-day rule in effect re. takeover offers. COS management was allegedly offered 0.30+ SU share per COS share in a friendly takeover bid in the spring and rejected it. Then the price of oil takes another significant hit downwards and SU proposes a hostile takeover offer of 0.25 SU share. Management then proclaims they are retroactively changing from a 60-day rule to a 120-day rule and don't want their shareholders to even vote on the current SU offer by the December 4 deadline, which was within the rules at COS at the time the hostile takeover offer was made. COS management then uses COS shareholder money to hire Royal Bank in a desperate attempt to find a "while knight" to make a better offer, and apparently have four "interested parties" kicking the tires as I write this, hoping that one or more of them will, for some reason, offer more than SU is offering in this oil price environment. COS Management would have looked a touch better if they had made their arguments to shareholders as to why they should reject the SU offer and let the shareholders vote on it by December 4. If the offer was rejected, they then could implement the new 120-day rule and proceed from there. To prevent shareholders from voting on this deal by retroactively changing the timeframe for consideration of offers appears to be a COS Board / Management effort avoid the possible embarrassment if COS shareholders voted in favour of the SU offer.....
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse