Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS T.CUS.DB.D

TSX:CUS.DB.D - Post Discussion

CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS > Scotia Commentary
View:
Post by ocean112 on Sep 07, 2014 10:59am

Scotia Commentary

Recent Update Text as of 3SEP14
. MEG refused to grant Canexus permission for the final pipeline tie-in.
 
. MEG Energy Corp. (MEG) refused to allow Canexus to complete the tie-in of the
Cold Lake (CL) pipeline system from Lamont Station into the MEG pipeline. This
connection is essential for the commissioning and start-up of Canexus'
oil-by-rail terminal because without it no oil will flow from the CL system to
the Bruderheim terminal. 
 
. Canexus believes MEG has no legal justification for its refusal and has taken
legal action against MEG. CUS sees itself as being on "very solid legal footing"
and expects to be "successful in completing the tie-in in the next coming weeks"
 
. Although there has been no confirmation by MEG, the statement of claim filed by
Canexus on September 2, 2014, states that MEG has "preferred its own interest
and effectively sought to render the NATO Terminal a private terminal for MEG's
exclusive use, or otherwise exploit the vulnerability of Canexus in an
unconscionable manner".
 
. We are not able at this time, to assess the financial impact on Canexus. Pending
a court decision or resolution of this conflict, we reiterate our SP rating and
$5.60 target but would expect CUS shares to be under pressure today.
 
Comment by ocean112 on Sep 07, 2014 11:15am
my take - MEG better have a pretty solid legal justification for refusing the tie in given all the investment and downstream impacts to other customers - given the previous posts - and what seems to be a contractual agreement - the onus is on them to show they have an out which by my read seems unlikely.....from a risk reward - I give this an 80/20 that it won't be a long court battle, and ...more  
Comment by 1short1 on Sep 07, 2014 1:35pm
I agree and hope this will be a short lived battle - it is one thing to screw us little investors but you can bet there are bigger fish than us out there (investors and companies) that will lose millions and they will be looking at MEG not just Canexus (hoping Canexus didn't royally screw it) . Just because of the pain to my brain I hope they (Canexus or anyone) hit MEG for damages
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities