RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NEED TO FIRE ALL EXECUTIVES Thanks for the kind words from both of you. @Lumberfeverlong has been on my 'ignore' list for some time, and I were to guess at the reason, it would be the habit of insulting rather than informing. He/she misunderstood the post in question -- I have seen corporate managers utterly destroy company value and ruin investors (if anyone is curious about examples, message me off-board), and CXR's crew has a long way to go before they rate the "worst ever" label that someone posted.
If it matters (why would it?) I am an underweight long on CXR. I am non-partisan; worthwhile ideas and analyses come from both sides. There's no money in caring who is short and who is long.
.
Lattice wrote: I agree with Marwood. TIcker is most definitely a long ... And aside from the fact that he likes fluffing his pillow at night with live hand grenades, he is the smartest long I know on this board.
Marwood wrote: Lumberfeverlong wrote: Hey ticker!
why would a company that makes twice as much EBITDA as it needs to pay debt hand over equity to debt holders? Do you know anything about insolvency laws or restructurings? This company has high leverage, but it is no where near insolvent. It will reduce its debt load from free cash over the next 12 to 18 months and then its debt will be at more normalized levels. At that point, you and your short dik riends will have moved on to some other short attack targets and those of us with the cohones to stick by the company that long will be handsomely rewarded mr fraudster!
You should read user postings before you accuse people of being frauds. TickerTwit's posts are honest; he seems like a really decent guy. Don't bash others because of your losses or lack of humour.