RE:Cahodeees Joke of a ResponseI read that fine piece of literature again and I think an even better example of how completely st@pid this guy is comes from the fine notion that when writing to the OSC, itself a quasi-court of Ontario, he is so dummmm as to imply that MT only filed this in the Ontario Court of Justice because a real court in the USA would never have accepted to claim in the first place. .... Honestly, this is beyond ironic it is bl@@dy dummmmmm. I definitely think that insulting the OSC intelligence and then suggesting Ontario is a Kangaroo jurisdiction is the BEST format to follow with that opening letter. If his chickens dies, he should lecture on How to write a Business Letter. ... Lettuce never even delivered such low hanging fruit to pluck!!!!!
puma1 wrote:
the letter is now out open with any Google search - go read it. After a long winded blurb about himself, he leans into one of his bigger assertions. He actually has the st@pidity to try and get the OSC to consider that there are obviously accounting disclosure issues because CXR has had 2 audit firms and 2 CFO's in short time period. He says all that to them when he knows d@m well that they switched from a mid-tier firm to a big 4. He also knows that the Sept financing group would have made a Big 4 firm a necessary condition of the financing. ......what amazes me is that he thinks the OSC won't understand the reasoning behind the audit and CFO replacements and instead will act on his selectively sliced mis-information. It is insulting to the OSC to treat them with such fallacious arguments. Does that idi0t really expect the OSC to act on such half information?