Comment by
lnvestor198 on Jul 07, 2016 11:52am
TOMMY, ???? Saying business model is in doubt and Concordia is a tough pill to swallow is not optimistic. Thought you were a bull on this bull board, why you post something to just get more followers for Cohodes?
Comment by
Lattice on Jul 07, 2016 1:11pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
HappyYoda on Jul 08, 2016 4:46am
Lattice, you have an interesting point and do agree with your comments, but how do they do it without damaging investors?
Comment by
HappyYoda on Jul 08, 2016 4:50am
Adamchess, you have an interesting point and I have also considered that as part of the optimism, but at what timeline can we accept as strategies not working? We are back in 2014 levels.
Comment by
sunshine7 on Jul 07, 2016 12:31pm
one of the few factual statements in this "article" is Its fair to say its easier to execute on this plan as a private company, Gowd says. You know it is a short plant when they give the eye drop example in percentage not currency. Any business reassesses their pricing to optimize shareholder value. That is their responsibility.
Comment by
curiousbuild on Jul 07, 2016 1:53pm
That failed fund manager should short Sacramento real estate. Let's see which one bursts first.. CB Z
Comment by
Register123 on Jul 07, 2016 6:09pm
TOMMY1, thanks for your post referencing the article.......I think it is important for investors to be aware of arguments, both pro and con, regarding a particular company, and consider them (or dismiss them) when making buy/hold/sell decisions, and I appreciate you sharing what you've found...........