This is what the shorts want you to believe. Given the heightened short activity on this board recently, we will be in for even more of a ride over the next couple of weeks prior to the Q2 results release date as the shorts pound this stock (and board) to scare off the regular retail investors. You have got to ask yourself, why do these posters feel the need to constantly bash this stock 24-7 over the weekend? They have a motive and that motive is to create smear campaigns and spread fear; with the current bear pharma sector, this stock is easily driven down.
I can understand the frustrations of many of the longs on this board, myself being one of them; I am currently over 27% down with 19,173 shares in this. The best thing management can do is deliver with decent resutls on Friday, August 12th and continue to deliver.
Any postitive news or views posted on this board are immediately battered down and you will be called all kinds of names - bagholders, mad, crazy, out of your mind etc. etc. This is to intimidate and to try and make you feel stupid to discourage you from posting.
The last short article posted was that on Seeking Alpha and referred to as "Excellent" by the main short poster on this board. It really isn't. Read the whole thread here as it shows a basher in full force.
https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.cxr/concordia-international-corp/13?threadid=25093826 Ask yourself the following questions about the article:
- Is There a Disclaimer?
- What Is the Nature of the Relationship?
- Is the Author Identified and Contact Information Provided?
- What Are the Author's Credentials?
- How Does the Report Read?
- Is There an Earnings Model and Target Price With Reasonable Assumptions?
- Is There Ongoing Research Coverage?
..and educate yourself about stock manipulation:
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/analyst/030102.asp You will see that thread regarding the "Excellent article" highlighted the fact that the only retweet on Twitter at that time was by Marc Cohodes (@AlderLaneeggs).
Now, when you click on the "RETWEETS" to show who retweeted the article, you will see it now states...
"2 users have asked not to be shown in this view. Learn More"
See for yourself:
https://twitter.com/CapitolistPig/status/758787813089251329 We have a good idea who was behind this new Capitolist Pig account and article - why else would you hide your retweet? Anyone can wrtite for Seeking Alpha so don't believe everything you read folks!
https://seekingalpha.com/page/become-a-seeking-alpha-contributor I find this all very interesting that the article published by a disclosed short to spread fear was found through Twitter, retweeted by Marc Cohodes and then he changed his settings so that the retweeted article no longer appeared on his timeline. If indeed this was a quality and honest article, what would be the harm in retweeting it? Surely that would not impact his chances to defend against the legal proceedings by Mark Thompson because, hey, he doesn't have anything to hide, until he does.
Just pointing out the facts here and wait for it.....here comes the rapid dilution of posts on this board so this thread quickly gets pushed down the board. New post titles with nothing of substance oh, and I may be called delusional or something like that. Wait for it...