Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Concordia Healthcare Corp. T.CXR.R

TSX:CXR.R - Post Discussion

Concordia Healthcare Corp. > Summary and my take on
View:
Post by greatplay on Nov 26, 2016 7:24pm

Summary and my take on

There's chess game occuring now, I'm good with it, and here's my take on...
Former CEO tried to sell the company, but couldn't find buyer, because company's debt is too big and there's a deteoriating revenue on US side, so Financial companies that make money on buying and then flipping companies walked away.

US Revenue continued to slide (last quarter was really bad), personally I hated it, but UK revenue was OK, legacy drugs business went up, but it's too small size of company's pie.

CEO can be a king or queen, it behaved like a king (chess has both pieces); kings in chess are really weak, but queens are most powerful piece on a board, but now we got new CEO, hopefully it behaves more like a queen.

Game continues on and player(s) behind Concordia is Goldman Sachs along with RBC, etc

The player decided to keep status quo and devalue bonds' values, which will result in smaller debt.

Everyone on short side talks about shareholders, but we are nothing to them, we represent 150MLN, which is nothing in comparison to 3.2BLN debt. Shareholders took haircut. Nobody has concern about us, except shorters on the board, who are playing dangerous game, yes, we can go down 100%, but it stocks goes to $5, it's also 100% to shorters loss, if it goes to $10, 200%;
It can happen on acquisition, let me talk about it too....

New CEO will be talking to bond holders and will try to figure out what haircut will be acceptable to them and how low company can shake them down to.

Then based on it, company's valuation will change, all bondholders will get 50c on $1; it will put debt valuation at $1.6 BLN, + payouts and other amounts = 1.8BLN

UK business was bought for 3.5 BLN US

Let's say Concordia overpaid 30%, that puts it to 2.45BLN, but most companies when they try to buy another will overpay some amounts.

Some say that Amco, is blah...blah, but in reality it's big pharma company with many products and company that will launch more in coming couple years.

Amco ownership, is the primary reason why Goldman organized 330MLN notes, it's valid business with good cashflow...

We talked about UK business, which is worth at least 2 BLN, but then there's still shrinking US business, at certain point with new leadership, it will stabilize. How?

1st step that I see coming from CEO is re-arranging access to CVS; I'm sure the CEO can make it happen, he was TEVA Americas president, if he can't directly, I'm sure he plays in golf with someone who knows CVS president.

CVS access will put a bottom on US market, with botton in, it will be worth half of UK; maybe a bit less; 0.5 to 1.2 BLN

What do we have: 2.5 to 3.5 BLN company's worth;

1.8 BLN was debt;

If you sell even for 2.5BLn, that represents 700MLN, 4.5 times of current value; 4.5 x 2.5 = 11.25 share price... Here's 400% loss for shorts, so shorts, you should be afraid the same way...
Comment by Sammy420 on Nov 26, 2016 7:26pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by greatplay on Nov 26, 2016 7:39pm
Sorry, it's a penny stock company; here's more interesting, we have big players and there's more logical thinking... The technicallies of stocks that were brought by shorter article (peels or something), along with discussion on Alpha, is irrelevant, because it's a game here with big money in and technicallies will not resolve it. Bondholders can't get their money back, they ...more  
Comment by greatplay on Nov 26, 2016 7:27pm
typo: 100% to shorters loss, if it goes to $10, 200%; should be: 100% to shorters loss, if it goes to $10, 400%; 
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse