RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Cont’d... madagascar123 "Buddy I didn't expect the unit free, if it worked as stated it would of been paid for, if not remove it everyone go home. I am not your enemy ,you missed the whole point ,management is not smart enough to take advantage of what was a golden opportunity for the company....."
Actually, if I understand what you were suggesting - to conduct a performance trial, and then if successful, agree to purchase 35 units - but also purchase a substanatial share position in Dynacert stock before announcing your own purchase - to try and make a "windfall" capital gain on the news ----- If that was your suggestion ---- Dynacert management was obligated by law to reject that, because if that was your plan - it is illegal. It is called "insider trading." Furthermore, the notion that a publically announced sale of 35 units would have a meaninful impact on the value of the company and it's stock price is absurd. I work with a Dynacert dearler in the US, who provided a unit for free to a 120-truck fleet operator which was part of a major US grocery chain. They conducted a 12-week 20K mile trial, and imporved the test-truck's fuel economy by 18.05%. In spite of that, the truck operator decided NOT to purchase any units for their fleet. The dealer paid for the HydraGEN unit and is now left with an $8K paperweight. If you and your truck company are that into "nickels and dimes," that you want to be offered a risk-free trial - as a means to finance your operations through further manipulation of the stock price of this supplier -- then you have bigger problems regarding how you run your trucking business. If Dynacert turned you down based on what you described - then they did their shareholders a great service, by acting within the law and with integrity.